Fulmore v. City of Greensboro
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion to dismiss of Defendant City of Greensboro (“the City”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. 27.) Plaintiff Julius Fulmore (“Fulmore”) opposes the motion. (Doc. 30.) The motion has been fully briefed, and a hearing was held on May 6, 2011. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
*402I. BACKGROUND
Fulmore commenced this action on May 21, 2009, and is proceeding currently on his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (Doc. 23.)…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Armstrong v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Jenkins v. Baltimore City Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Wray v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Coleman v. Kettler ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- ELSAYED v. FAMILY FARE LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.