Starks-Umoja v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DEEM DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AS ADMITTED AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE UNAUTHENTICATED EXHIBITS
McCALLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed April 1, 2003. Plaintiff responded in opposition on May 2, 2003. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 1
I. Motion to Deem Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts as Admitted
Plaintiffs initial Response…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. National College of Virginia, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Marshall v. EyeCare SpecialtiesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Eren v. Mars, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Goddard v. Allegiance Administrators, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Louisville Galleria, LLC v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022