Legal Opinion
Dage v. Time Warner Cable
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 19, 2005No. C-1-04-90PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Pleadings. (Doc. # 15). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Original plaintiff Richard Dage 1 (“Dage”) sued Time Warner Cable (“Time Warner”), his former employer, claiming retaliatory termination and harassment in violation of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and disability discrimination in violation of Ohio Revised Code…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Abdulsalaam v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Cunningham v. Tennessee Cancer Specialists, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Strayhorn v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Strayhorn v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- United States ex rel. Holbrook v. Brink's Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.