Legal Opinion

Cummins v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 6, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilor, J.

The preparation and presentation of this case both in this court and in the court below indicates considerable feeling on the part of the parties litig'ant and zeal on the part of counsel representing them. Exhaustive and able briefs are presented on behalf of the appellants and the appellee. They leave little to be desired in treatment of the issues involved. The suit is essentially a contest between J. W. Cummins and W. R. McCoy, the 7-Up Bottling Co. of the Appalachians being named as a defendant largely for the sake of conformity.

J. W. Cummins and W. R. McCoy are brothers-in-law. J. W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guernsey v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Van Slyke v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Reaves Lumber Co. v. Cain-Hurley Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McClain v. Kimbrough Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Carter v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. WF Holt Co. v. a & E Elec. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Vintage Health Resources, Inc. v. GuianganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API