Legal Opinion

Reaves Lumber Co. v. Cain-Hurley Lumber Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Defendant, Reaves, appealed to the court of appeals from a judgment of $2,404 and $146.84 interest. That conrt reversed and dismissed the suit on the ground, not raised in the pleadings, that the fund which was the subject of the litigation was created by a transaction between these parties which was tainted with fraud; the legal maxim, “Ex dolo malo non oritur actio,” being given application. Petitioner, Cain-Hurley Lumber Company, here insists, first, that fraud is not shown by the record; second, that this issue is not made by the pleadings; and, third, that this being an action at law,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Cary-Lombard Lumber Co. v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. President of Springfield Bank v. MerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baugh v. NovakTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Palmer v. Aeolian Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Cummins v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  4. Whitley v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Blackburn & McCune, PLLC v. Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. and Pre-Paid Legal Services of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API