Reaves Lumber Co. v. Cain-Hurley Lumber Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
Defendant, Reaves, appealed to the court of appeals from a judgment of $2,404 and $146.84 interest. That conrt reversed and dismissed the suit on the ground, not raised in the pleadings, that the fund which was the subject of the litigation was created by a transaction between these parties which was tainted with fraud; the legal maxim, “Ex dolo malo non oritur actio,” being given application. Petitioner, Cain-Hurley Lumber Company, here insists, first, that fraud is not shown by the record; second, that this issue is not made by the pleadings; and, third, that this being an action at law,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cary-Lombard Lumber Co. v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- President of Springfield Bank v. MerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baugh v. NovakTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Palmer v. Aeolian Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Cummins v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Whitley v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
- Blackburn & McCune, PLLC v. Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. and Pre-Paid Legal Services of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.