Legal Opinion

Guernsey v. Cook

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 8, 1876PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The contract declared on has been held to be the personal contract of the defendant. 117 Mass. 548. It provided in substance on the part of the defendant and Mr. Beebe, who together owned a majority of the stock of the India Company, that the plaintiff should be made treasurer of that company at a stipulated salary; the plaintiff on his part agreeing to take part of their stock at par, with an agreement that it should be taken back and an allowance made for interest, “in case it should be desirable for any reason to dispense with the plaintiff’s service as treasurer.” The question is whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Tudor v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  3. Myers v. MeinrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Gibbs v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Curtis v. AspinwallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Eastman Marble Co. v. Vermont Marble Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API