Legal Opinion
Greyhound Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 6, 1981No. 80-1271PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by TAMM, Circuit Judge.
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner in this direct review proceeding challenges an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission or ICC) entered on remand from a previous decision of this court, Greyhound Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 551 F.2d 414 (D.C.Cir. 1977). The primary issue in this case is whether the Commission’s continued exercise of its securities jurisdiction over Greyhound Corporation (Greyhound) fails to conform to the mandate of this court. Also involved is the validity of the Commission’s imposition of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, No. 76-1674Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Marshall v. LansingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- City of Los Angeles v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Portland Cement Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Checkosky v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.