Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Lansing
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 10, 1988No. 86-5737PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the United States Parole Commission from a grant of a writ *936of habeas corpus to a federal prisoner whose parole release guidelines were found by the district court to have been improperly determined.1 The district court granted the writ after two successive remands to the Commission — the first for further explanation of the Commission’s decision, and the second for recategorization of the severity of petitioner’s offense after the court found the further explanation inadequate. Although the Commission complied with the second…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. Lydia CooperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Erasmo Gambino v. E.W. Morris (Warden-Fci Fairton) United States Parole CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Sejid Smriko v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- William Phifer v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Larry Gene Hull v. Robert M. Freeman Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.