Legal Opinion

Checkosky v. Sec

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 20, 1994No. 92-1396PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

23 F.3d 452

306 U.S.App.D.C. 144, 62 USLW 2770, Fed.

Sec. L. Rep. P 98,229,

29 Fed.R.Serv.3d 300

David J. CHECKOSKY, Norman A. Aldrich, Petitioners,

v.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent,

In re Application of David J. CHECKOSKY and Norman A.

Aldrich for the Perpetuation of Certain Testimony

and the Preservation of Other Evidence,

In re David J. CHECKOSKY and Norman A. Aldrich, Petitioners.

Nos. 92-1396, 92-5158, 92-1214.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Oct. 26, 1993.

Decided May 20, 1994.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Securities and Exchange…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited119 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Gadda v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. U.S. E.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. Dorsen v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API