Legal Opinion
Checkosky v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 20, 1994No. Nos. 92-1396, 92-5158, 92-1214PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
*454Circuit Judge SILBERMAN filed a separate opinion.
Circuit Judge RANDOLPH filed a separate opinion.
District Judge REYNOLDS filed a separate opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
PER CURIAM;:
The case is remanded to the Commission for a more adequate explanation of its interpretation of Rule 2(e)(l)(ii) and its application to this case. The court rejects unanimously, as per Part V of Judge Randolph’s opinion, petitioners’ challenge to the regularity of the Commission’s proceedings.
So Ordered.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
The Commission suspended petitioners, partners in…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Thomas OwensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- (HC) Johnson v. MattesonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Richson-Bey v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.