Legal Opinion
Weyerhaeuser Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, No. 76-1674
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 5, 1978No. 1011PublishedCited by 210 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:
Under the aegis of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (the Act), Pub.L. No. 92-500, 86 Stat. 816, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1376, as amended, Clean Water Act of 1977, Pub.L. No. 95-217, 91 Stat. 1566, the Environmental Protection Agency has embarked upon a step-by-step process of issuing effluent limitations for each industry that discharges pollutants into the waters of the United States. By these consolidated petitions, members of one such industry, American pulp and paper makers, challenge the validity of EPA regulations limiting the 1977-83 effluent…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Walters v. Dept. of Police of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Alabama Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.