Legal Opinion
Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 28, 1984No. Appeal 84-791 and 84-824PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.
In this patent infringement case, appellant/cross-appellee Shelcore, Inc. (Shel-core), appeals from a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, holding invalid claims 1-12 of Strauss, U.S. patent No. 4,208,831 (the ’831 utility patent) and finding the claim of Strauss, U.S. Des. patent No. 257,-780 (the ’780 design patent) to be not infringed. We affirm.
Background
Shelcore is the assignee of the ’831 utility and ’780 design patents in suit. Both related to a driving simulator toy. The child’s legs fit in a “tunnel” under the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.