In re Hellsund
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Almond, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 7-10, and 21-23 of appellant’s application entitled “Continuous Casting Process and Apparatus.”1 No claims were allowed.
The invention relates to the continuous casting of polymers into sheets. Appellant’s apparatus can best be understood with reference to Figs, la, lb and 2, reproduced below:
*1383
Appellant casts polymeric sheets by feeding a monomer between two moving endless belts and curing (polymerizing) the monomer while it is contained within the space between the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Sutter Products Company v. Pettibone Mulliken CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Application of Thomas F. FaciusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re BergyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Coleco Industries, Inc. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Coleco Industries, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re FoutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- In re NomiyaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.