Kellogg v. Lovely
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee. Trespass on the case. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
The circumstances of this controversy are as follows: In October, 1818, the defendant [Lovely] sold the plaintiff [Kellogg] on credit, a mare, buggy and harness for the agreed price of $250, and the plaintiff gave his note together with a mortgage on the property for the entire sum.
The mare was with foal and about the first of June following she dropped the colt. " On the first of July the mortgage became due, and Kellogg failing to pay, Lovely proceeded to take the property. There was no dispute about his right to take the mare, buggy and harness, but the parties appear to have differed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Forman v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Putnam v. WyleyNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Stewart ex rel. Ashley v. Ball's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- Linnendoll v. Doe & TerhuneNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Hanson v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Meyer Bros. v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Shoobert v. De MottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Funk v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Rogers v. HighlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.