Legal Opinion

Danville State Bank v. May

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 3, 1928No. 28,247PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a suit to have a contract construed to be an equitable chattel mortgage and for appropriate relief. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition, and it has appealed. The petition named Will Coslett, the Commerce Trust Company and Charles May, as sheriff of Harper county, as *715defendants, but the only defendant served with process was the sheriff; hence we must treat the case as between the Danville State Bank as plaintiff and Charles May, as sheriff, as defendant.

The original petition alleged that on September…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. C. C. Isely Lumber Co. v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Walker v. BradenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Dodge v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  5. Holt v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seymour v. WildgenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. McCoy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  3. Johnson v. Interstate Securities Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Blattler v. WestermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Parsons v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API