Legal Opinion

Beall v. Spear

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1920No. 21,976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Brown district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

T. J. Beall brought replevin against James Spear, Mattie Spear, and Phil Wah-Wa-Sic, all the defendants beings Indians, basing his claim upon two chattel mortgages. The trial court held that as a matter of law the plaintiff was entitled to the possession of the property, submitting to the jury only the question of the value of his interest, and that merely as a matter of computation. Judgment was rendered accordingly, fixing the amount of the plaintiff’s lien at $288.36, and the defendants appeal.

*6911. Although, other items wtere included in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Holt v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Danville State Bank v. MaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. American Oil & Refining Co. v. Liberty-Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Balderas, Juan A/K/A ApacheTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Stockgrowers State Bank v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API