Beall v. Spear
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Brown district court; William I. Stuart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
T. J. Beall brought replevin against James Spear, Mattie Spear, and Phil Wah-Wa-Sic, all the defendants beings Indians, basing his claim upon two chattel mortgages. The trial court held that as a matter of law the plaintiff was entitled to the possession of the property, submitting to the jury only the question of the value of his interest, and that merely as a matter of computation. Judgment was rendered accordingly, fixing the amount of the plaintiff’s lien at $288.36, and the defendants appeal.
*6911. Although, other items wtere included in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Holt v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Danville State Bank v. MaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- American Oil & Refining Co. v. Liberty-Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Balderas, Juan A/K/A ApacheTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Stockgrowers State Bank v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936