Legal Opinion
Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc. v. Barram
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 28, 2000No. 99-1258PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc., Ann Riley & Associates, Ltd., AR-TI Recording, Inc., California Shorthand Reporting, Executive Court Reporters, and Miller Reporting Co., Inc. (collectively, the “contractors”) appeal from a decision of the General Services Administration (GSA) Board of Contract Appeals, denying their claims for breach of contract. See Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc. v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 99-1 B.C.A. (CCH) ¶ 30,139 (Oct. 30,1998). Because the board erred in concluding that the terms of the contracts preclude recovery of lost profits, we reverse and remand.
Background
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Maxima Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Caldwell & Santmyer, Inc. v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Seaboard Lumber Company and Capital Development Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Applied Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.