Legal Opinion

O'Dess v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1996No. Docket 168827PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was brought in 1991 pursuant to MCL 469.221; MSA 22.591, * 1 governing the abandonment of subsidized railroads. Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. We affirm.

In the 1880s, defendant’s predecessor acquired land from plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest in order to construct the Pontiac Oxford railroad track on the land. The consideration for the land varied from $1 to $200. The Pontiac Oxford track was constructed, at least in part, by public aid and local subscription. The railroad has been abandoned since October 1986.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chase v. American Cartage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Minty v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Briggs v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Detroit Edison Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. HicksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. CarsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. CS&P, INC. v. City of MidlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. DerrorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API