Legal Opinion
CS&P, INC. v. City of Midland
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 1998No. Docket 192303, 192304PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWahls, J.
In Docket No. 192303, defendant City of Midland appeals as of right from the trial court’s amended judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs CS&P, Inc., 3-S Construction, Inc., and LBL Investments following a jury trial. In Docket No. 192304, Midland appeals as of right from the amended judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company following a consolidated jury trial. We affirm.
According to the undisputed testimony, water and sewage emanating from the toilets and floor drains invaded the premises of a commercial building located in Midland and owned by LBL Investments.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Cloverleaf Car Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Li v. FeldtMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lessard v. City of Allen ParkDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Antonian v. City of Dearborn HeightsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- CS&P, INC. v. City of MidlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jeanne Jones v. City of Farmington HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.