Legal Opinion

Briggs v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 138, Calendar No. 36,566PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

In conformance with the resolution adopted by its common council, the city of Grand Rapids, in 1911, purchased 12 acres of land for park purposes from Charles S. Briggs, its owner, and one of the plaintiffs in this cause. The deed executed by Briggs showed a consideration of $6,000, and these words followed the description of .the property:

“This purchase of land is for park purposes.”

Plaintiffs claim that the original price asked by Briggs was $15,000; but that, owing to the fact that the property was to be purchased by the city for park purposes, and would be known as “Briggs Park, ’ ’ he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wright v. WalcottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. East Chicago Co. v. City of East ChicagoIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
  5. Lansing v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Huntington Woods v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Mason County Civic Research Council v. Mason CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Buddy v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Plassey v. S. Loewenstein & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. O'Dess v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API