Legal Opinion

People v. Derror

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 2005No. Docket 258346, 259315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P.J.

In these consolidated appeals, the prosecution appeals by leave granted 1 two trial court orders ruling that “carboxy THC” 2 is not a schedule 1 controlled substance under MCL 333.7212(l)(d) for purposes of punishing violations of MCL 257.625(8), which prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle with any amount of a schedule 1 controlled substance in the body. In People v Derror, the prosecution also appeals a trial court order ruling that, pursuant to MCL 257.625(4) and MCL 257.625(5), the prosecution must prove that the presence of a controlled substance in a defendant’s body is a proximate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DerrorMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Tyson Foods, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People of Michigan v. Dennis Wayne KurtsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People of Michigan v. Kellie Nichole StockMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. People v. DerrorMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API