Legal Opinion
Surtman v. Secretary of State
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1944No. Docket No. 50, Calendar No. 42,710PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
The validity and constitutionality of Act No. 248, Pub. Acts 1943 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1943, §§4685-53, 4685-53a, Stat. Ann. §§9.1543, 9.1543 [1]), is challenged in this appeal. The title of the act is as follows:
“An act to amend section 3 of Act No. 203 of the Public Acts of 1933, entitled, ‘An act to provide for the revocation and suspension of operators’ and chauffeurs’ licenses and registration certificates; to require proof of ability to respond in damages for injuries caused by the operation of motor vehicles; to prescribe the form of and conditions in insurance policies covering such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Rosenblum v. GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Gillaspie v. Department of Public SafetyTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. StehlekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Crawford County v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.