Legal Opinion

People v. Thompson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 168, Calendar No. 36,364PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Defendant’s motion to quash the information filed against him was granted on the ground that the statute (1 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 4693 to 4754 inclusive) under . which . defendant was charged is unconstitutional. The people’s appeal is from this holding. The pertinent portions of this statute, commonly known as the uniform motor vehicle act, read:

Title — “An act to regulate the operation of vehicles on highways; providing for traffic signs and signals; defining the power of local authorities to enact or enforce ordinances, rules or regulations in regard to matters embraced within the provisions…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. NobleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. StehlekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. Marathon Oil CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. BammesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API