Legal Opinion

Sitz v. Department of State Police

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1993No. 93851, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

The case before us concerns a challenge to the use of sobriety checkpoints by the Michigan State Police. The United States Supreme Court held that the checkpoint scheme does not constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Michigan Dep’t of *747State Police v Sitz, 496 US 444; 110 S Ct 2481; 110 L Ed 2d 412 (1990). On remand from that Court, a two-judge majority of the Michigan Court of Appeals determined that sobriety checkpoints violate art 1, § 11 of the Michigan Constitution. Because there is no support in the constitutional history of Michigan for the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  5. State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API