Sitz v. Department of State Police
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
The case before us concerns a challenge to the use of sobriety checkpoints by the Michigan State Police. The United States Supreme Court held that the checkpoint scheme does not constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Michigan Dep’t of *747State Police v Sitz, 496 US 444; 110 S Ct 2481; 110 L Ed 2d 412 (1990). On remand from that Court, a two-judge majority of the Michigan Court of Appeals determined that sobriety checkpoints violate art 1, § 11 of the Michigan Constitution. Because there is no support in the constitutional history of Michigan for the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.