Legal Opinion
Clark v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 15, 1985No. 631-84LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS *
PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:
In this suit, plaintiff seeks just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution for damages resulting from the contamination of the water supply to her residence by the United States Air Force.
The complaint alleges the following: Plaintiff owns and resides on property located in Pierce County, Washington, adjacent to the McChord Air Force Base. The United States Air Force has caused or allowed dangerous chemicals and other contaminants to flow from a waste dump at McChord Air Force Base into plaintiff’s water…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Yuba Goldfields, Inc. And Placer Service Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Globe Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Myers Investigative & Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- B.W. Parkway Associates Limited Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.