Legal Opinion
Clark v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 12, 1990No. 631-84LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This case comes before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment under RUSCC 56.1 This opinion follows a related decision issued by the United States District Court for the Western.District' of Washington, which awarded plaintiff damages for diminution in the value of her property caused by the negligent disposal of chemicals at an airbase adjacent to plaintiff’s property. Clark v. United States, 660 F.Supp. 1164 (W.D.Wash.1987), affd, 856 F.2d 1433 (9th Cir.1988). Plaintiff argues in her motion that she should receive relief for her initial taking…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bedford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Tecon Engineers, Inc., a Corporation and Related Cases v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Lucas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Robert Haphey and Carl J. Bondietti v. Linn County Linn County Sheriff's Office Art Martinak, Sheriff, Acting in His Official and Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Reed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Gates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.