Legal Opinion

United States v. Frierson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 24, 1987No. ACMR 8600367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, a special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members found appellant guilty of wrongful sale of military property in violation of Article 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 908 (1982). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $426.00 pay per month for six months and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Appellant alleges that he was denied a fair trial because one or more of the members of his court-martial either fell asleep or were inattentative. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. Carl Victor CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Otis Thurmond Curry and Vincent Anthony CiraoloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. GroceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. William HesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. NormentU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. NormentUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API