Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Norment

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 11, 1992No. 66,891; CM 9001079Published

1ConcurrenceCrawford, Judge

Inattentive court members and improper communications between judges, court members, and counsel undermine the military justice system. I agree that these are not to be “whimsically dismissed.” 34 MJ at 227 n. 2. When these issues are known or reasonably should have been known by defense counsel at trial, they should be raised immediately so they can be disposed of appropriately either by challenges to the participants, mistrial, or other remedies. The allegations of inattentive court members and ex parte communications are easy to make but difficult to examine months or years after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. FriersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API