Legal Opinion
United States v. William Hester
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1973No. 73-1528PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
William Hester appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 1 We affirm.
This motion arises out of the trial and conviction of Hester for violating the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 21 U. S.C. § 841(a)(1). See United States v. Hester, 465 F.2d 1125 (8th Cir. 1972) 2 Essentially Hester asserts that his conviction should be vacated because: 1) he was unlawfully arrested; 2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel; 3) he was denied a fair trial; 4) government agents perjured themselves during trial. Specifically Hester claims that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roosevelt Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Judson Edgar Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Carl Victor CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Otis Thurmond Curry and Vincent Anthony CiraoloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- George Moran v. Marvin HoganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Donald R. Nance, Ii, and Thomas N. TilestonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Frank DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Frank DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- James B. Crismon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.