Todd v. Simonis
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.
A jury was unable to agree upon verdicts in these consolidated negligence cases. Thereupon, defendants moved for judgments, pursuant to our recently repealed (PA 1961, No 236) jury disagreement statute (CL 1948, § 691.701 [Stat Ann §27.1471]), and judgments for defendants were entered by the trial judge supported by a written opinion in which he found plaintiff Donald Todd contributorily negligent as a matter of law. On appeal from such judgments we do not consider whether they conform with or do violence to the clear or overwhelming weight of the evidence, as we would upon review of decision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- McCullough v. Ward Trucking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ingram v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Diamond v. HolsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Pigg v. BloomMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Desmarais v. MyefskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Dockham v. MarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.