Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Holstein

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. Calendar 58, Docket 50,320PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff, a passenger in a northbound automobile driven by her husband, was injured in a T-intersection collision with a westbound automobile driven by defendant Holstein, owned by defendants Erlandson and occupied by Mrs. Erlandson as a passenger. Plaintiff sued for resultant damages. Decision on plaintiff’s motion, made at the conclusion of the proofs, for directed verdict as to liability was reserved. Judgment on jury verdict of no cause for action entered in favor of defendants after plaintiff’s motions for directed verdict and judgment non obstante veredicto were denied. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Anders v. CloverMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Todd v. SimonisMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hoag v. FentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. EylMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Book v. DatemaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Green v. RichardsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Powell v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Kloosterman v. Kalamazoo City Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API