Legal Opinion

Dockham v. Marr

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1964No. Calendar 33, Docket 50,198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff went to defendants’ theater and asked permission to enter, without pay-' ing an admission fee, for the purpose of looking for and getting his young son. He was granted the permission and did enter. It was a bright afternoon. It was much darker in the theater. Testimony was adduced of varying estimates as to ho.w long it would take eyes to adjust from the outdoor brightness to the dimness inside. Plaintiff stood in the rear of the theater and, for about 1-1/2 minutes, looked toward the screen on which a moving picture was being shown. He did not see his son. Against a side wall, at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McKinney v. YelavichMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ackerberg v. Muskegon Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clifford Gowdy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  2. Clifford Gowdy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Jaworski v. Great Scott Supermarkets, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jaworski v. Great Scott Supermarkets, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API