Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Henry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1964No. Calender 14, Docket 50,311PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

In Tocld v. Simonis, 370 Mich 342, 1 a negligence case, we reversed a judgment for defendants after jury disagreement, 2 which judgment was based upon the trial judge’s finding that he should have directed a verdict for defendants be cause plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. In the process of reversing that judgment, we noted that the standard by which directed verdicts are judged on appeal is whether, upon favorable-to-plaintiff view of the evidence, all reasonable men would agree that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. In support we cited 5 recent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ackerberg v. Muskegon Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. McCullough v. Ward Trucking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ray v. Transamerica InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Koehler v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Taylor v. MathewsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Vanden Bosch v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Freeman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API