Ciaramelia v. Brownell
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtMissal, J.
The issue involved here is whether a writ of habeas corpus will lie to have warrants or detainers declared void and removed from the plaintiff’s department of correction file if that removal will entitle him to participate in prisoner treatment and rehabilitation programs, including furlough privileges and parole.
The writ of habeas corpus is available to a person restrained of his liberty who desires a hearing to determine the legality of his detention. Wojculewics v. Cummings, 143 Conn. 624, 627. Where a person is confined pursuant to a judgment, the validity of his detention under that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coffin v. ReichardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Wojculewicz v. CummingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Perell v. Warden of State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Flaherty v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Dukuly v. WardenConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Sanchez v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Anderson v. Bronson, No. Cv 88 0000451 S (Jul. 23, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990