Legal Opinion

Wojculewicz v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 17, 1956PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to obtain a writ of habeas corpus directed against the warden of the state prison. The court issued the writ but subsequently dismissed it, and from the judgment rendered the plaintiff has appealed.

In his return, the warden alleged that he was holding the plaintiff by virtue of a mittimus wherein it was recited that the plaintiff had been indicted by a grand jury for murder in the first degree on two counts, that he had been presented to the Superior Court and placed on trial before the jury, that the jury had returned a verdict of guilty as charged…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Henry v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. In Re FrederichSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. LaReau v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Snyder v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. Reed v. ReinckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API