Legal Opinion
DeRosa v. Bell
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 31, 1998No. 3:94CV1616(JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [docs. # 29, # 34]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Evelyn DeRosa, the owner of the Linden Nursery School (“Linden”), brings suit for violations of her civil rights against various officials of the Department of Public Health and the Department of Children and Fami lies, 1 for their roles in the September 1991 summary suspension of DeRosa’s license to operate the day care center.
Defendants Bell, Lewis, and Addiss move for summary judgment on the grounds of absolute immunity, or in the alternative, qualified immunity [doc. #29]. Defendants Hartman and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marshall v. N.Y. State Pub. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Miller v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
- Carroll v. RagagliaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Pace v. MontalvoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001