Legal Opinion
Pace v. Montalvo
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 24, 2001No. 3:99-cv-01635PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ELLEN B. BURNS, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This cause of action is a one-count Complaint based on 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, acting jointly and severally, disrupted their family life and “infringed the right of each plaintiff to family integrity and privacy.” Specifically, Plaintiffs contend that the following actions infringed on their constitutional rights, for which they seek redress via Section 1983:(1) the taking of custody of the Pace children on the evening of July-16, 1997, pursuant to a 96-hour hold during a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Levar T. Henry v. Jodi Hill-Lilly and Alyssa BurroughsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026