Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Ragaglia
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 10, 2003No. CIV. 3:02CV790PCDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Defendants Kristine D. Ragaglia, Judith Fritz, and Laura Curran move for summary judgment on all counts. 1 For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motion is granted.
1. Background 2
In July, 1998, the child John Doe 3 , a special needs child with behavior problems, was removed from his birth mother’s care and was placed by DCF as a foster child in with Plaintiff, who was his primary caregiver.
From August, 1997 through March, 2008, Ragaglia was Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF). Plaintiff…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CASTANZA v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Ward v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004