Legal Opinion

United States v. Joe Henry Carter, Jr., Joseph Estel Hammack

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1992No. 13-20103PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants Joe Henry Carter, Jr. (Carter) and Joseph Estel Hammack (Hammack) were convicted of conspiring to manufacture amphetamine and of possessing, and conspiring to possess, phenylace-tone with the intent to manufacture amphetamine. They both appeal, raising various challenges to their convictions and sentences. We affirm.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Viewed most favorably to the government, the evidence reflected the following.

Officer Brad Johnson (Johnson) of the Fort Worth Police Department and the Tar-rant County Narcotics Intelligence Task Force…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. United States v. Puig-InfanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Willard Cortez RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Daniel Michael KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. David LambertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API