Legal Opinion

United States v. David Lambert

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1993No. 91-1856PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns § 4A1.3 of the Sentencing Guidelines, which enunciates the procedure a district court must follow when departing upward from the guidelines sentence because a defendant’s criminal history score inadequately.reflects his culpability. A divided panel of this court affirmed Lambert’s conviction but noted the intracircuit conflict in our approach to § 4A1.3. Proceeding en banc, we resolve the conflict by reaffirming the methodology for a § 4A1.3 criminal history departure first expressed in United States v. Lopez, 871 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.1989).…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Humberto CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Joe Henry Carter, Jr., Joseph Estel HammackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. United States v. Posada-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. People v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. United States v. Felmon Lakeith Laury, A/K/A Felmon Keith Ashley, A/K/A Walter Ray NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Mary Jean FaubionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API