Legal Opinion

United States v. Bermea

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1994No. 92-7349PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

30 F.3d 1539

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Baldemar BERMEA, Rogelio Bermea, Lorenzo Rodriguez, Manuel

Garcia, Honorio Garza, Matilde Perez, Guadalupe

Bermea, Enrique Avalos and Teodoro

Pedraza, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 92-7349.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 25, 1994.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 1994.

David Almaraz (court appointed counsel), Laredo, TX, for Matilde Perez.

Allen Cazier, San Antonio, TX, for Baldemar Bermea.

Allen Cazier, San Antonio, TX, for Guadalupe Bermea.

C.J. Quintanilla (court appointed counsel), McAllen, TX, for Manuel Garcia.

David Diaz, Corpus…

2Cases cited105 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Posada-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API