Legal Opinion

United States v. Puig-Infante

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1994No. 92-02503PublishedCited by 233 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants were charged with and convicted of participating in a conspiracy involving the importation of marihuana from Mexico into the United States. Araeeli Castro, Perla De Los Santos, Maria Abigail Puig (Abigail Puig), Juan Ernesto Castro-Cuellar (Juan Castro), and Jose Alejandro Puig-In-fante (Jose Puig) were convicted of conspiracy, importation, and other drug charges. Appellants raise numerous issues on appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and vacate and remand in part.

Facts and Proceedings Below

The story of this conspiracy begins sometime in…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. CalverleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Martin Gonzalez MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Manuel Flores, United States of America v. Juan Raul GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API