Legal Opinion

Lybecker v. United Pacific Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1965No. 37530PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The sole question is whether a statute of limitations bars plaintiffs’ claims for relief, as they apply to defendant-appellant United Pacific Insurance Company.

This is an action by four plaintiffs, Norman Lybecker, Corydon, Inc., Johnson Union Warehouse Company, Inc., and Cochran and Son Elevator. We will designate them hereafter as Lybecker, Corydon, Johnson and Cochran.

In 1959, McDonnell was a licensed “Commission Merchant and Credit Buyer” of agricultural products within the provisions of Laws of 1955, chapter 14 as amended by chapter 262. As a condition precedent to issuance of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of KeglersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Norco Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. King County, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. BRAZIER CONSTR.Washington Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API