Legal Opinion

Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch v. Berwald

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1999No. B129174PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Plaintiff law firm sued its former clients for “damages for legal services rendered.” Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to the complaint on statute of limitations grounds and denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration based on newly discovered evidence. The principal issues on appeal are whether the complaint and exhibits thereto revealed the common counts alleged therein were barred by the applicable statutes of limitation, and whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. C & H. FOODS CO. v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Parker v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
  2. Carter v. Prime Healthcare Paradise Valley LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Larson v. UHS of Rancho Springs CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Precision Pay Phones v. Qwest Communications Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API