Legal Opinion
Precision Pay Phones v. Qwest Communications Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 31, 2002No. C-02-0213 EMC, C-02-0215 EMCPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO REMAND
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Court, having reviewed the briefs, supporting documentation and record in this case, as well as having heard the argument of counsel, hereby grants the plaintiffs motions to remand these actions to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Precision Pay Phones (“Plaintiff’) owns payphones and is a “payphone service provider” (“PSP”). PSPs generally receive compensation for use of their telephones in two ways. First, they collect coins directly deposited into their…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lippitt v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co., LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Greene v. Sprint Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- APCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- King v. National General InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.