Legal Opinion
Forsher v. Bugliosi
California Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1980No. S.F. 24062PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANUEL, J.
Plaintiff James Forsher appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to an order sustaining a general demurrer without leave to amend to his first amended complaint for libel and invasion of privacy. We affirm.
The defendant, Vincent Bugliosi (Bugliosi), was at one time a deputy district attorney, and in this capacity prosecuted and obtained a conviction against Charles Manson and certain of his coterie for the highly publicized crimes collectively referred to as the Tate-LaBianca killings. Bugliosi has been recognized by the public as being an authority on these…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Turner v. KTRK Television, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Luther Haynes and Dorothy Haynes v. Alfred A. Knopf, Incorporated, and Nicholas LemannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.