Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Lind

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1986No. Civ. 24087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit entered after plaintiffs’ opening statement at trial. The primary issue tendered is whether the failure of a trustor to provide fire insurance on the secured property in accordance with the terms of the trust deed precludes the trustor, as a matter of law, from maintaining an action for wrongful foreclosure when the sole basis for declaring a default and instituting foreclosure is the lack of fire insurance.

We hold that the failure to secure fire insurance on the secured property precludes an action for wrongful foreclosure only when…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bromme v. PavittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Alpert v. VILLA ROMANO HOMEOWNERS ASSN.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Markowitz v. Fidelity National Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Ellis v. Chevron, U. S. A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Alexander Group, LLC v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API