Alpert v. VILLA ROMANO HOMEOWNERS ASSN.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOODMAN, J. *
Ann Alpert (Alpert) appeals from the judgment of non-suit entered in favor of respondent Villa Romano Homeowners Association (VRHA) at the close of Alpert’s case-in-chief. Alpert’s complaint alleged that she suffered severe injuries when she tripped and fell on the upturned and broken sidewalk adjacent to the condominium complex managed by VRHA. In this appeal Alpert asks that we determine if the owner and possessor of property owes a duty to warn or protect pedestrians from allegedly dangerous conditions known to be present. We conclude that there is such a duty and that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Jordan v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Conte v. Girard Orthopaedic Surgeons Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Dillingham-Ray Wilson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Stonegate Homeowners Ass'n v. StabenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.