Legal Opinion

County of San Luis Obispo v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1891No. 13556PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new. trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

We are satisfied with the opinion filed in this case on October 2, 1890, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment, and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, are affirmed.

The following is the opinion above referred to, filed October 2, 1890:—

*434Gibson, C.

Action to recover of the defendant his proportion of a special tax levied in road district No. 2 of San Luis Obispo County, in the year 1888, for the purpose of raising the sum of ten thousand dollars to erect a bridge across the Salinas River, at San Miguel, in said district. Judgment passed for plaintiff, from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Williams v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. County of Santa Clara v. Southern Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Comstock v. County of YoloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mecom v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. La Grange Hydraulic Gold Mining Co. v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wicktor v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Liebrandt v. SorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API