Legal Opinion
Franklin County v. Furry
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 2, 1906No. 1,170PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois.
1Per curiam
The action was tried by the court without a jury. The errors assigned are of two kinds.
Certain assignments are based on the court’s rulings respecting “propositions of law” drawn by counsel and handed to the court as if a jury were to be instructed. These assignments present no question for review. Streeter v. Sanitary District, 133 Fed. 124, 66 C. C. A. 190, and cases there cited.
The remaining assignments are dependent upon matters of fact, and their consideration requires the presence in the record of a proper bill of exceptions. The judgment was entered at the June term, 1904. Within the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Streeter v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- Western Dredging & Improvement Co. v. HeldmaierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Vance v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Schneider v. KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Skinner v. Franklin CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Illinois · 1910